Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Nov 2009 22:57 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes Another week gone bye-bye, another Week in Review. Ubuntu 9.10 was the star of the week of course, but we also talked about language, the HTC Hero, and wall warts. Yes we did.
Thread beginning with comment 392250
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ubuntu...
by helf on Sun 1st Nov 2009 23:29 UTC
helf
Member since:
2005-07-06

I made the mistake of deciding to do a distro upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10. DON'T try that. It might work, or it might fail horribly and leave you with a barely usable installation like it did me ;)

RE: Ubuntu...
by bousozoku on Sun 1st Nov 2009 23:41 in reply to "Ubuntu..."
bousozoku Member since:
2006-01-23

I made the mistake of deciding to do a distro upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10. DON'T try that. It might work, or it might fail horribly and leave you with a barely usable installation like it did me ;)


I'm beginning to think I'll wait until 9.10.2. Wasn't there such a thing with 9.04? Besides, I'm having enough fun trying to get Snow Leopard to work properly for me.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Ubuntu...
by cmost on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 00:47 in reply to "Ubuntu..."
cmost Member since:
2006-07-16

I made the mistake of deciding to do a distro upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10. DON'T try that. It might work, or it might fail horribly and leave you with a barely usable installation like it did me ;)


Contrary to popular belief, upgrades from one version of Ubuntu to the next rarely if ever work correctly. I think because it could theoretically work for a select few people, the devs like to tout the process as foolproof for everybody. Hardly! Many people utilize PPA repositories or install software from source which could present problems when upgrading. I learned that lesson the hard way quite awhile ago and always do a fresh install.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: Ubuntu...
by sbenitezb on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 01:19 in reply to "RE: Ubuntu..."
sbenitezb Member since:
2005-07-22

I think rolling release distros are a better way to keep your system up to date without having to switch to a different repository every six month. Not newbie proof, of course.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: Ubuntu...
by bousozoku on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 01:30 in reply to "RE: Ubuntu..."
bousozoku Member since:
2006-01-23


Contrary to popular belief, upgrades from one version of Ubuntu to the next rarely if ever work correctly. I think because it could theoretically work for a select few people, the devs like to tout the process as foolproof for everybody. Hardly! Many people utilize PPA repositories or install software from source which could present problems when upgrading. I learned that lesson the hard way quite awhile ago and always do a fresh install.


According to the "How did your upgrade/installation go?" poll in the Ubuntu forums, fresh installations and upgrades aren't that dissimilar.

I've had good luck, I suppose, even with some software added outside Synaptic, from 7.04 to 9.04. They seemed to get worse as time progressed. Of course, the Broadcom wireless drivers always seem to be a problem.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: Ubuntu...
by sultanqasim on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 02:49 in reply to "RE: Ubuntu..."
sultanqasim Member since:
2006-10-28

I'd second that. I've never succeeded in upgrading Ubuntu; something always goes wrong, and it's something different each time. I must always do a clean install.

However, I've never had problems upgrading with rolling release distros (i.e. Arch Linux).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: Ubuntu...
by Soulbender on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 07:53 in reply to "RE: Ubuntu..."
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

Contrary to popular belief, upgrades from one version of Ubuntu to the next rarely if ever work correctly


Really. That must be why I have distro upgraded my laptop since Intrepid and it is still working fine. I'm also using PPA's without any problems when upgrading.

I think because it could theoretically work for a select few people, the devs like to tout the process as foolproof for everybody


I cant recall when and where it has been touted as "foolproof for everybody".

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: Ubuntu...
by darknexus on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 16:11 in reply to "RE: Ubuntu..."
darknexus Member since:
2008-07-15

I don't think any upgrade is fool proof for everyone. No matter what os, no matter what software, there's just no way to take into account every possible configuration change one might have made. I've had Ubuntu upgrades work perfectly, and I've had them royally screw up. I've had the same experiences with Arch, Gentoo, Debian, OpenBSD, OS X, and certainly Windows just to name a few. Os upgrading will never be a completely smooth experience, there's just too much that can't be tested.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE: Ubuntu...
by Johann Chua on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 09:59 in reply to "Ubuntu..."
Johann Chua Member since:
2005-07-22

Worked fine for me. Used the alternate CD image (downloaded via BitTorrent, then mounted the ISO) instead of directly using the update manager for the upgrade.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2