Linked by Pobrecito Hablador on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 21:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 392441
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The solution to that would be parity data saved inline with normal data, sacrificing a little bit of space. Then, some small % of data could be hosed, yet still recovered, whether it was the data, hash, or parity.
But, since server people want better drives and more backups, us cheapskates want all of that 1TB our $80 paid for, and we all want faster storage...I don't see it happening
.




Member since:
2008-10-16
That opens an interesting question: What's the correct stuff. The checksum or the data
Furthermore: Dedup uses the already computed checksums of the filesystem. You don't have to sync it to your data.