Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 10:13 UTC
Law and Order While the Apple v. Psystar case is currently on hold until the hearing regarding the motions for a summary judgement takes place (November 12) the Psystar v. Apple case (still with me?) is only just beginning. Psystar has amended its original complaint in this second lawsuit, asking the judge to order Apple to cease calling Psystar's business "illegal", claiming it hurts the clone maker financially.
Thread beginning with comment 392569
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Kroc
Member since:
2005-11-10

The best way is simply to not care. The GPL _cares_ too much about what is happening to the code away from the originator.

BSD, CC doesn’t. I don’t care what other people are doing with my code, I’m not paranoid. I know that that I can never dictate what other people should do, I can only educate and help nudge people in that direction. I don’t have time to be hunting people down and nagging them, personally.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

So? You don't care about your code (there must be thousands upon thousands of lines of your code out there I assume, right?) good for you. Other people do, so Pysstar can go pound sand and come up with their own code if they don't want to comply with the wishes of people who have stated clearly the fact they don't want their code to be commercially distributed by people who had diddly squat to do with it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

Pysstar can go pound sand and come up with their own code if they don't want to comply with the wishes of people who have stated clearly the fact they don't want their code to be commercially distributed by people who had diddly squat to do with it.


If Apple is unhappy with the way Psystar uses their code, then maybe they should... oh, I dunno... STOP SELLING IT TO THEM?!?!?

A radical, outside-the-box idea, I know - but by God, it's crazy enough that it just might work!

Apple's just acting like a spoiled little kid who gives a toy away, then demands it back 5 minutes later.

Edited 2009-11-04 17:00 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

Ed W. Cogburn Member since:
2009-07-24

The GPL _cares_ too much about what is happening to the code away from the originator.


help nudge people in that direction


The license in question (used by boot-132) isn't the GPL, its the APSL (Apple Public Source License), which kinda makes your anti-GPL rant look a little silly, but hey, don't mind me, use whatever license you want, and I won't even bother to 'nudge' you if you use one that I don't. ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1