Linked by snydeq on Wed 6th Jan 2010 20:08 UTC
Google InfoWorld's Galen Gruman writes that the main potential game-changing attribute of the Nexus One - that Google is selling the device direct - does nothing to move the industry past carrier lock-in. "At first, I wanted to credit Google for making a tentative step in the direction of smartphone freedom. But that step is so tentative and ineffectual that frankly I think it's a cynical fig leaf covering the usual practices," Gruman writes. At issue is a political battle regarding walled gardens in the U.S. cellular market, a fight that will take years to result in any true consumer freedom. "The only way we'll ever get the ability to choose a smartphone and carrier independently is for the platform providers that count - Apple, Google, and RIM - to first develop only multiband 'world' smartphones and then refuse to sell their devices (or in Google's case, use its Android license to forbid the sale of devices) to carriers that block or interfere with device portability."
Thread beginning with comment 403053
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
computeruser
Member since:
2009-07-21

I've never heard wifi used to talk about anything other than 802.11.

Someone has to provide centralized network infrastructure in order to provide the quality of service of a modern cellular network. An organization with the ability and funding to do this would resemble a modern cellular provider without the telephone service part.

Reply Parent Score: 1

dnstest Member since:
2006-06-11

Correct, if you do a simple Wikipedia search you will find this:
"Wi-Fi is often used as a synonym for IEEE 802.11 technology"

Wi-Fi is a certification that a device conforms to one of the 802.11 standards.

Reply Parent Score: 1