Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th Jan 2010 16:22 UTC, submitted by Dale Smoker
Thread beginning with comment 405698
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Money moves the world around
by diegoviola on Sun 24th Jan 2010 18:41
in reply to "Money moves the world around"
RE[2]: Money moves the world around
by strcpy on Sun 24th Jan 2010 19:11
in reply to "RE: Money moves the world around"
RE: Money moves the world around
by dagw on Sun 24th Jan 2010 21:50
in reply to "Money moves the world around"
RE[2]: Money moves the world around
by WorknMan on Sun 24th Jan 2010 22:20
in reply to "RE: Money moves the world around"
I know several people who work on open source software out of pure enthusiasm, and consider the fact that people are actually paying them for it an awesome bonus. Money and enthusiasm aren't in any way mutually exclusive.
It's awesome when you get to spend time doing something you love, but it's even better when somebody pays you for the privilege
RE: Money moves the world around
by Laurence on Mon 25th Jan 2010 17:30
in reply to "Money moves the world around"
It's just the sad truth; money makes things happen, pure enthusiasm only lasts for so long. Apparently Linux kernel has reached the point where pure enthusiasm just isn't enough anymore.
Sad truth?
Personally I see this as good news.
It shows that Linux is a viable business and therefore proves that Linux deserves to be considered a serious OS every bit as much as Windows or OS X.
If there wasn't money in Linux nor paid developers contributing to the kernel - then Linux would effectively be nothing more than a hobbist OS.
So I really don't get what's so sad about this?
Do people want Linux to be taken seriously or not?





Member since:
2006-02-15
It's just the sad truth; money makes things happen, pure enthusiasm only lasts for so long. Apparently Linux kernel has reached the point where pure enthusiasm just isn't enough anymore.