Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 406589
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Turing's Poisoned Apple
by Laurence on Fri 29th Jan 2010 02:16 UTC in reply to "RE: Turing's Poisoned Apple"
Laurence
Member since:
2007-03-26


- It can't run OSX apps, but those aren't really meant to work well on netbooks either


What about other tablet/slate PCs though?
As this device is competing with them too.



(netbooks have even lower res screen and are much slower).

I think you've been looking at the bottem end of the market too much.
There's plenty of devices out there that can easily output 1024x768 and has the same screen size.

If you venture out of the "netbook" classification a moment but continue to look at simular devices then you'd see there's even more to choose from with devices as powerful as laptops but at the same dimensions (or marginally bigger) as netbooks.


It is less capable, but netbooks don't really run "real" apps like photoshop or visual studio or heavy games well.

Tablet and Slate PCs do though.
And there is a whole golf of applications between photoshop and whatever social networking frontends are popular on the iPhone.

One of my closest mates does ALL of his web development on his netbook.

My missus uses hers to write up lesson plans for the classes she teaches (if she tried to do that on a touch screen she'd quickly throw the device out of the window!)


The iPad can run apps for most things most people do better than any ($300-$1200) netbook (i.e. reading websites, with easy zoom and changing of orientation for the small screen, or going though tons of photos or emails with a multi touch screen instead of an unusable mini trackpad)

again, at a much higher price and again, your vastly under estimating what many people DO do on their netbooks.


- It doesn't fit in your pocket, but its small enough to hold without feeling that you're lugging a laptop in your palm

So where are you going to put it when you're not holding it?
In a bag? Oh well, you may as well have taken a proper fully functional (albeit compact) PC then.


- The device is a portable computer/media device, with a eBook feature.

You can read eBooks on netbooks and tablets/slates if you wanted to.
Most people don't though because backlit screens are a PITA compared to eInk or real printed media.


Good touch screen keyboards are not bad as they may seem.


touch screen keyboards are TERRIBLE. They're not even a close approximation to a hardware keyboard.
No matter how big you make the graphics, it's still not tactile. And that will always be their fundamental downfall.
Software keyboards are also a good way to induce RSI or other typing injuries as there's no cushion for your finger tips

The keys in the iPad are reasonable size (same size as netbook keyboards)

The sole reason I didn't buy an iPhone was because I just couldn't get to grips with it's keyboard.

I don't look at the keyboard as I type normally, so why should I have to on my mobile devices just because Apple have an inherent disliking of buttons?

and you can use the keyboard attachment if you want a full size keyboard.

Extra stuff to carry around. I've already addressed this point and why it's impractical.

You will need an attachment if you want a full size keyboard on a netbook too.

It's not the size that matters - it's the fact that it's tactile.
You can feel your way around the keys and instantly know when you've missed a button or can feel where your hands are on the keys (as in which letter) without having to look down every 5 seconds.

Do Kindles excite you enough to make you even think about them?

I don't read much - so personally no. But I'm not Kindles target audience either.

Over $250 for a single purpose book reader when even an iPod that costs less can do much more?

You're forgetting about the Android eBook readers ;)

The iPad isn't perfect but it's the most desirable tablet ever made so far.

Desirable if you take form over function. Personally I don't. Personally I was hoping for something special but this isn't it.

Personally, I think the tablet market is still wide open.

Reply Parent Score: 2

sultanqasim Member since:
2006-10-28

Then the iPad's not for you. Just because it doesn't do what you want doesn't mean its a bad device. Name a single hand holdable tablet with a Pixel Qi touchscreen and tactile keyboard with decent battery life, viewing angle, speed, that runs windows, and costs under $1000. If one exists, please tell me about it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

Then the iPad's not for you. Just because it doesn't do what you want doesn't mean its a bad device.


I'm saying I can't see how it's useable for almost anyone.

Sure, there will be a few people that will like, even love, this device.
But is there enough people to make this product profitable?

So I'm stating that despite all the hype, ultimatly it doesn't solve a problem enough people have to make this device worth while.

Reply Parent Score: 2