Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Mar 2010 21:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 412227
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-12-10
Really, you wiggled the scroll-bar on two Linux systems? That's pretty convincing. It's not clear from your comment that you compared Linux against Windows in your small test, as you mention you installed ArchLinux on both, open source drivers, etc. Did you perform the same test on both OSs?
If there's a feeling that the Linux version of Firefox is not as responsive it is probably because there are some places where the performance is/was noticeably worse.
See:
http://www.tuxradar.com/content/browser-benchmarks-2-even-wine-beat...
Although they are from last year, the notion that the Windows version may be more responsive isn't unfounded. They even run this test through WINE, and even that layer of indirection doesn't stop the Windows binary from outperforming the Linux one.