Linked by Joel Dahl on Sun 25th Apr 2010 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 420762
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
I'd have thought the reverse was true. If FreeBSD didn't have ZFS then some FreeBSD users might consider OpenSolaris.
FreeBSD is a very different beast to OpenSolaris - so I couldn't see FreeBSD users (ie users that would otherwise be happy with FBSD) migrating to OpenSolaris unless it was for some features they felt they needed but FreeBSD didn't offer
I know everyones computer requirements differ, but for me ZFS would be a major selling point in my returning to FreeBSD. Unfortunately I've not felt persuaded about the stability of FBSDs current implementation