Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 9th May 2010 22:29 UTC, submitted by Plexus
Thread beginning with comment 423670
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: There is nothing interesting in the new Amigas.
by tylerdurden on Tue 11th May 2010 01:04
in reply to "RE: There is nothing interesting in the new Amigas."
RE[3]: There is nothing interesting in the new Amigas.
by Raffaele on Tue 11th May 2010 12:51
in reply to "RE[2]: There is nothing interesting in the new Amigas."
Everything in Amiga is at least a decade behind the times, even their memes. ;-)
As long as Amiga in its age was already beyond its times, seems that other systems got 25 years to reach the Amiga. What a slooow progress in human history waiting other systems reach in 2010 what Amiga was in 1985.
Lol! :-D
Edited 2010-05-11 12:57 UTC
RE[2]: There is nothing interesting in the new Amigas.
by sorpigal on Tue 11th May 2010 16:40
in reply to "RE: There is nothing interesting in the new Amigas."
No Linux Dependencies garbage.
Now this is a low blow. It's easy to have no dependency problems when you have a small number of well known platforms to target and those platforms move not at all (or at a glacial pace).
Linux would be the same way if there weren't so much of it with so many people working on it.




Member since:
2005-09-20
Oh, I don't know... no Windows virii, trojan horses, etc. No DRM, No "Genuine Advantage" crap.
No Linux Dependencies garbage.