Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th May 2010 18:39 UTC, submitted by hotice
Thread beginning with comment 424280
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by phoenix
by Yagami on Thu 13th May 2010 22:58
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by phoenix"
wow ... i just wow !!!
kde's aseigo has been saying that for years and people burned him for it.
THAT WAS THE WHOLE POINT of creating the folder view , and not making the default activity with the "desktop folder", but having the folder you wanted , or even more than one folder
RE[4]: Comment by phoenix
by mgl.branco on Fri 14th May 2010 13:39
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by phoenix"




Member since:
2005-07-11
You're missing the point: the KDE4 approach is all manual and not that easily accessible to complete newbies.
How is it not easily accessible? It's a folder view, as in "see the contents of a folder". By default, there's one folder view that shows the contents of the ~/Desktop folder, just like the default desktop everywhere. Want something different? It's a click away.
I have a desktop displaying 4 different folder views. How does one do that in GNOME?
I can setup 4 virtual desktops, each showing a different folder, without being locked into some horrible ~/Desktop1 ~/Desktop2 mess (or ~/Desktop/Work ~/Desktop/Whatever mess).
Forcing the filesystem to match a single window manager is just wrong. Period.
Or, make it even simpler and make it configurable from the get-go.
That's your opinion. I actually see it as they taking the KDE4 idea and improving it. "
To each their own, but I still fail to see how forcing a user's filesystem hierarchy to fit a single WM is "improving" anything.