Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th May 2010 16:28 UTC, submitted by bnolsen
Multimedia, AV Yes, I broke my own rules and used a "breaking" modifier for this story (let me have my fun for once). Here we have it, as the rumour mill suggested, Google has released the On2 VP8 video codec as open source (royalty free, BSD-style), while also launching the WebM container format which combines a VP8 video stream with Vorbis audio. Support for WebM has been enabled on YouTube's HTML5 beta, and you can download patches against ffmpeg as well as DirectShow filters for Windows (Gstreamer plugins are labelled as "coming soon"). Mac users are out of luck for now; no QuickTime plugins have been announced yet. Update: The WebM blog is now open - and the list of partners is pretty decent already. It includes ARM, NVIDIA, AMD, Qualcomm, and many others. Update II: VP8 will be baked into Flash. Update III: The Opera labs version with WebM support has been released too, for Linux, Mac, and Windows.
Thread beginning with comment 425395
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Someone will complain
by pfortuny on Wed 19th May 2010 16:44 UTC
pfortuny
Member since:
2006-02-05

for not being GPL (or whatever applies) licensed, your bets?

Reply Score: 0

RE: Someone will complain
by soulrebel123 on Wed 19th May 2010 17:11 in reply to "Someone will complain"
soulrebel123 Member since:
2009-05-13

Probably this is one of the few things that can benefit from a BSD style license. If many company adopt it and it finds a way in many products, there will be enough interest to improve it, even if nobody is required to publish his modifications.

One negative aspect is that it could lead to closed source forks which are incompatible between one another.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Someone will complain
by phoenix on Wed 19th May 2010 19:03 in reply to "RE: Someone will complain"
phoenix Member since:
2005-07-11

Probably this is one of the few things that can benefit from a BSD style license. If many company adopt it and it finds a way in many products, there will be enough interest to improve it, even if nobody is required to publish his modifications.


BSD-style licenses are good for infrastructure code that sits below applications (codecs, network stacks, protocols, dictionaries, libraries, etc). Things that you want multiple groups to pick up, and to include in their products, to improve interoperability and compatibility. Does it really matter if MS or Apple or Foo Inc takes the code, sticks it in Widget Y, and then sells it? No. It's better they took this code then wrote their own from scratch causes all kinds of incompatilities.

GPL-style licenses are better for end-user applications where you differentiate yourself from the competition (web browsers, word processors, mail clients, etc).

BSD-style licenses get the code out there and used by everybody to build bigger and better things. And GPL-style licenses keep those bigger and better things "open" and "free".

Reply Parent Score: 7

RE[2]: Someone will complain
by nt_jerkface on Wed 19th May 2010 19:17 in reply to "RE: Someone will complain"
nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26


One negative aspect is that it could lead to closed source forks which are incompatible between one another.


If there are any incompatible forks they will likely be open source.

BSD is a much better fit for a codec since it can be used in proprietary browsers and video players without any issues.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Someone will complain
by aaronb on Wed 19th May 2010 18:18 in reply to "Someone will complain"
aaronb Member since:
2005-07-06

I think a BSD style licence was chosen because google wants to deter patent trolls. In other words, BSD style licenses and the GPL both have their place in this world.

Quoted from:
http://www.webmproject.org/license/software/


Subject to the terms and conditions of the above License, Google hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer this implementation of VP8, where such license applies only to those patent claims, both currently owned by Google and acquired in the future, licensable by Google that are necessarily infringed by this implementation of VP8. If You or your agent or exclusive licensee institute or order or agree to the institution of patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that this implementation of VP8 or any code incorporated within this implementation of VP8 constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, or inducement of patent infringement, then any rights granted to You under this License for this implementation of VP8 shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed.


Edited 2010-05-19 18:21 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2