First Look: VP8 vs. H264
Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Benchmarks Now that Google has opened up VP8, the big question is obviously how it'll hold up to H264. Of course, VP8 already wins by default because it's open source and royalty free, but that doesn't mean we should neglect the quality issue. Jan Ozer from StreamingMedia.com has put up an article comparing the two codecs, and concludes that the differences are negligible - in fact, only in some high-motion videos did H264 win out. As always, this is just one comparison and most certainly anything but conclusive. Update: Another comparison. I can't spot the difference, but then again, I'm no expert.
E-mail Print r 8   · Read More · 99 Comment(s) http://osne.ws/i0e
Thread beginning with comment 426764
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: They are different codecs
by lemur2 on Thu 27th May 2010 00:16 UTC in reply to "They are different codecs"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

- on still screenshots, h.264 wins in all cases;
- on (almost) all resolutions (in motion), both codecs seemed the same;


Exactly. People actually see motion as blur. There is no real point in precise sharp definition for parts of the video which are in high motion ... people are going to see it as blur anyway.

These observations also highlight that there are major differences in approach between h.264 and VP8. The codecs use distinctly different methods to achieve the same end (compression of digital video data). Ergo, one would surmise that these codecs do not infringe on one another's patents.

Reply Parent Score: 2