Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Jun 2010 15:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 428405
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The real scandal are ..
by Kroc on Sun 6th Jun 2010 09:11
in reply to "RE: The real scandal are .."
I did complain about those to the author, http://rakaz.nl/2010/03/the-html5-test.html#comments and he gives an explanation of how the video codecs affect the score (it’s based on the number of codecs supported, not the mere presence of them)
RE[3]: The real scandal are ..
by Neolander on Sun 6th Jun 2010 10:14
in reply to "RE[2]: The real scandal are .."




Member since:
2010-03-08
http://www.html5test.com/
From the title "The HTML5 test – how well does your browser support HTML5?"
Now let's look at some of the tests...
"H.264 codec support No"
"MP3 codec support No"
"AAC codec support No"
So now these are part of the HTML5 specification ? Strange, I don't find any of these on W3C's website...