Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jun 2010 22:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 429615
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: What a conflict of terms...
by lemur2 on Fri 11th Jun 2010 04:23
in reply to "What a conflict of terms..."
To use these terms... Faster, More Secure, Less Resources, More Stable in reference to anything Flash related is retarded. It just ain't so.
Well the CPU does have 'Less Resources' left over when running Flash. It is therefore, as you correctly point out, retarded.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+retarded&meta=
retard - cause to move more slowly or operate at a slower rate
Seems to me like at least some of those terms are applicable then.
RE: What a conflict of terms...
by WorknMan on Fri 11th Jun 2010 04:30
in reply to "What a conflict of terms..."
To use these terms...
Faster, More Secure, Less Resources, More Stable
in reference to anything Flash related is retarded. It just ain't so.
Faster, More Secure, Less Resources, More Stable
in reference to anything Flash related is retarded. It just ain't so.
Yeah, and many of these are also bullet points on a lot of new versions of software, from anti virus packages to media players and everything in between. Problem is, how the hell does an end user quantify this, especially the more secure and more stable parts ...




Member since:
2007-06-24
To use these terms...
Faster, More Secure, Less Resources, More Stable
in reference to anything Flash related is retarded. It just ain't so.