Linked by Igor Ljubuncic on Mon 21st Jun 2010 09:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 430925
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Dedoimedo
by Dedoimedo on Mon 21st Jun 2010 17:08
in reply to "RE: Comment by Dedoimedo"
RE[3]: Comment by Dedoimedo
by fewt on Mon 21st Jun 2010 17:13
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Dedoimedo"
And what do you mean by: This is exactly the mistake that Microsoft made in 80s, 90s?
Dedoimedo
Dedoimedo
Do you seriously not know?
it's all about statistical probability.
the home usage security card is seriously overplayed
Real security is agnostic
Exploits exist, vulnerabilities exist. On the same note, huge meteors exist and cosmic ray bursts exist. Likelihood of witnessing one before imminent doom? Not very high.
All mistakes Microsoft made until they decided to take security seriously.





Member since:
2010-06-09
Dedoimedo here. First, this is the first article posting here, so please excuse the few rough points, like the missing space in paragraph one and such, will be sorted out. Be gentle.
Now, thanks for the comments.
Linux security: we can argue about this to death, but the point is: it's all about statistical probability.
I think the home usage security card is seriously overplayed, regardless of the operating system used and if you get it right, the operating system becomes a non-issue. Real security is agnostic.
Exploits exist, vulnerabilities exist. On the same note, huge meteors exist and cosmic ray bursts exist. Likelihood of witnessing one before imminent doom? Not very high.
If you don't go about wildly executing stuff, then you won't see the pixel devils take over your machine.
Cheers,
Dedoimedo
This is exactly the same security mistake that Microsoft made in the 80s and 90s.