Linked by gsyoungblood on Tue 20th Jul 2010 18:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 434173
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The vast majority of end users don't load custom ROM's on their phones, they stick with the status quo and receive updates from their carrier.
or don't receive them (like me and my trusty 'old' Samsung i7500 Galaxy).
If I couldn't install custom, unapproved roms on there I'd still be stuck with Android 1.5. A lot of the viability of Motorola's model (and the happiness of their users) hinges on their ability to keep supporting their devices through a couple of Android version updates. If I'd have a Droid X and they'd keep updating it with high quality recent firmwares, I'd not be too worried about the inability to apply custom roms; however, if they'd leave me in the cold as Samsung has, while also unable to apply my own choice of firmwares, that would surely have been my very last Motorola phone ever.
Still, I can't see why it'd be so hard for them to allow users to opt out of warranty and killswitch with a big red 'void warranty' button (preferably irreversible). I'd like to know that I have a choice in the matter.
or don't receive them (like me and my trusty 'old' Samsung i7500 Galaxy).
If I couldn't install custom, unapproved roms on there I'd still be stuck with Android 1.5. A lot of the viability of Motorola's model (and the happiness of their users) hinges on their ability to keep supporting their devices through a couple of Android version updates. If I'd have a Droid X and they'd keep updating it with high quality recent firmwares, I'd not be too worried about the inability to apply custom roms; however, if they'd leave me in the cold as Samsung has, while also unable to apply my own choice of firmwares, that would surely have been my very last Motorola phone ever.
Still, I can't see why it'd be so hard for them to allow users to opt out of warranty and killswitch with a big red 'void warranty' button (preferably irreversible). I'd like to know that I have a choice in the matter.
If I couldn't install custom, unapproved roms on there I'd still be stuck with Android 1.5. A lot of the viability of Motorola's model (and the happiness of their users) hinges on their ability to keep supporting their devices through a couple of Android version updates. If I'd have a Droid X and they'd keep updating it with high quality recent firmwares, I'd not be too worried about the inability to apply custom roms; however, if they'd leave me in the cold as Samsung has, while also unable to apply my own choice of firmwares, that would surely have been my very last Motorola phone ever.
Still, I can't see why it'd be so hard for them to allow users to opt out of warranty and killswitch with a big red 'void warranty' button (preferably irreversible). I'd like to know that I have a choice in the matter.
Because some Jack Ass from New York will sue the said company for 'not adequately explaining the implication of opting out'. You can thank the US and its screwed up legal system for why obvious options aren't provided. Sue this, sue that - its a nation of f-cking idiots who sue over anything at the drop of a hat. If it isn't some idiot suing because the idiot spilt coffee over herself, its some w-nker demanding that salt and partially hydrogenated fats are banned because obviously people are too stupid to realise fast food is bad for you (shock! horror!).
I for one laugh though; all the Android fans thinking that their Jesus Phone(tm) will provide them with tonnes of freedom unlike the iPhone they so readily despise. Well, you've got a phone less than a year old - had that been an iPhone you would have received iPhoneOS 4.0 free of charge and without needing to hack your device to get it. Maybe that should be a take home message to all those who bad mouthed Apple only to get royally shafted by Motorola/HTC/etc. with no Android OS update.
Edited 2010-07-21 09:04 UTC
Sweet cheeks, there is nothing stopping you from clearly stating that you will not support users who run custom ROM's on their phones.
Oh right, a warning screen solves all problems.
Just put an 21+ warning on your website and that will keep out kids and teenagers. Morality will ensure that no one will lie about their age.
Oh right, a warning screen solves all problems.
Just put an 21+ warning on your website and that will keep out kids and teenagers. Morality will ensure that no one will lie about their age.
Just put an 21+ warning on your website and that will keep out kids and teenagers. Morality will ensure that no one will lie about their age.
The two aren't comparable; sell your software and when they report or complain, ask them whether they're running a custom ROM (because you're unable to duplicate the error with the official ROM) and then explain that you do not support custom ROM's. You've warned them on your website, you've warned them in the marketplace and to top it off you told them via direct communication - if they didn't get the subtle hint then you simply should cut your losses and let them wallow in their own stupidity.
Edited 2010-07-21 19:24 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-06
i'm sick of crappy incompatible roms which crash my applications and result in bad ratings.
those who want to root and load custom roms should get a symbian/meego device already and leave android alone.
Sweet cheeks, there is nothing stopping you from clearly stating that you will not support users who run custom ROM's on their phones. The vast majority of end users don't load custom ROM's on their phones, they stick with the status quo and receive updates from their carrier. Quite honestly you're making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Edited 2010-07-21 05:41 UTC