Linked by David Adams on Mon 2nd Aug 2010 04:00 UTC, submitted by kallisti5
Thread beginning with comment 435216
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-05-06
And Garrett actually tries to achieve binary compatibility. :-)
You mean they are rewriting i18n ?
If yes, that's what I said it should be done. Either rewrite the blob or replace it with FreeBSD libc.
If they are just trying to make a interface to bolt the blob on top of it, then that won't work. Oracle will screw the easily that way. If nothing else, Oracle can revoke license for the binary and assert copyright infringement. After all, blobs are proprietary software.