Linked by David Adams on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 16:05 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Linux As we mentioned in a previous article, Red Hat advocate Greg DeKoenigsberg claimed that due to the much larger amount of code it's contributed, Red Hat is a better open source citizen than Canonical, adding, "Canonical is a marketing organization masquerading as an engineering organization." A Computerworld blog retorts that that's no insult; and that marketing Linux could be just as important to the cause as contributing code. Updated
Thread beginning with comment 435375
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Except for one thing:
by crhylove on Wed 4th Aug 2010 16:37 UTC
Member since:

Cannonical's marketing SUCKS!

Brown? BLEGH!

Buttons on the wrong side? Why?

Linux Mint is twice the OS and has a much friendlier community, better default layout, and over all a much more logical choice on pretty much every level.

Mint FTW!

Reply Score: 0

RE: Except for one thing:
by Soulbender on Fri 6th Aug 2010 06:18 in reply to "Except for one thing:"
Soulbender Member since:

Funny then how Mint is entirely based on...Ubuntu.

Reply Parent Score: 2