To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't think that the essence of the NYTimes article is about using a software license agreement as a tool to misuse. I read a sentence like "lawyers retained by Microsoft have staunchly backed the police" as a claim that Microsoft is actively involved getting people convicted.
Well, certain groups of people are obsessed with Microsoft. I don't like their software, too, but have more urgent business to do instead of finding new ways to insult Microsoft.
Far as I am concerned, after the DOJ case in 1999, they are much more open. Is it because they are forced to or did they have change of heart, frankly I don't care. I think that making analogies between corporate entities and human individuals is pretty stupid. Thinking of some companies as "evil" and others as "good" won't get you anywhere. Well, except, it would increase on line traffic and number of forum posts, which will make advertisers happy.
If there was no Microsoft, Russian authorities would have found another way to make life harder to opposition. They are creative in that kind of business and have long tradition that goes back in the days of Tsar.
Right, because that makes it ok. If we don't then someone else would. Hey, I mean, what the hell. Who cares if someone sell weapons to both sides of a conflict right? Someone has to, you know. Who cares if you betray your country and sell military secrets to Al Queda or China or North Korea? They'd have found out sooner or later anyway.
Fatalism is awesome like that.





Member since:
2009-08-26
Blaming MS is pretty silly when the Russian government will find all kinds of methods to target opponents.
They've already gone after quite a few organizations with accusations of not following tax code properly.
If North Korea were to hang someone over pirating Photoshop should we be angry with Adobe?
The Russian government doesn't recognize the same rights that Western countries value. More shocking news at 11.
Edited 2010-09-12 23:25 UTC