Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 22:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 441120
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: You obviously don't get open source
by felipec on Wed 15th Sep 2010 21:26
in reply to "RE[5]: You obviously don't get open source"
From support costs. You are aware RedHat doesn't magically make money appear, right?
"support costs"? What does that even mean? RedHat is a company, just like any other company their primary goal is to make money, and they do, and they reserve part of that money to support the linux community, and contribute.
What prevents Canonical from doing the same?
RE[7]: You obviously don't get open source
by dragossh on Thu 16th Sep 2010 15:11
in reply to "RE[6]: You obviously don't get open source"
http://www.redhat.com/services/ Enjoy!
It's not anything that prevents them, it's just that Canonical decided to focus on one thing: the desktop. Blaming them for this is like blaming Samsung for taking Android and putting a skin on top of it.





Member since:
2008-12-16
From support costs. You are aware RedHat doesn't magically make money appear, right?