Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Oct 2010 21:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 444874
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: And Forgetting Harmony project in the process
by sirspudd on Wed 13th Oct 2010 04:28
in reply to "And Forgetting Harmony project in the process"
I love the way "Harmony" seems to be a universal project name for discord:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmony_(disambiguation)#Computing
RE: And Forgetting Harmony project in the process
by fithisux on Wed 13th Oct 2010 07:48
in reply to "And Forgetting Harmony project in the process"
IBM *shifted* it'S focus from the Harmony project to openJDK, which is great for openJDK but not for Harmony, I guess that in the light of the recent lawsuit (oracle vs google) IBM saw that there was no viable commercial future in the Harmony project regarding it's legal status and the impossibility to get a java validation kit from sun/oracle.
Too bad, the harmony project is a great project for an alternative jre that was mostly compatible with the official one.
Too bad, the harmony project is a great project for an alternative jre that was mostly compatible with the official one.
They can reuse their expertise and code to create/improve a decent D2.0 compiler. For my taste it is a good alternative. They could also provide a GUI toolkit and packages for Google go. However D is closer to Java.




Member since:
2006-03-20
IBM *shifted* it'S focus from the Harmony project to openJDK, which is great for openJDK but not for Harmony, I guess that in the light of the recent lawsuit (oracle vs google) IBM saw that there was no viable commercial future in the Harmony project regarding it's legal status and the impossibility to get a java validation kit from sun/oracle.
Too bad, the harmony project is a great project for an alternative jre that was mostly compatible with the official one.