Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Oct 2010 09:55 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 445024
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I still don't get why we still have those problems. I give my OS 6GB of memory, 4 cpu cores at 3GHz, 1 SSD and 4 2TB harddisks. And still things like watching a 100MB video file will be extremely choppy when I do large moves from one harddisk to the other.
Is there no genius that can solve this? Or do we let SSD's solve the problem like we did with quad cores?
Is there no genius that can solve this? Or do we let SSD's solve the problem like we did with quad cores?
The problem is not hardware resource, it's the way they are distributed. With better scheduling, we would get a smooth experience on anything that's not totally IO-bound.




Member since:
2006-04-10
Does it mean that I, as a user, should give up on scheduled backup or on music playback in the background ?
I still don't get why we still have those problems. I give my OS 6GB of memory, 4 cpu cores at 3GHz, 1 SSD and 4 2TB harddisks. And still things like watching a 100MB video file will be extremely choppy when I do large moves from one harddisk to the other.
Is there no genius that can solve this? Or do we let SSD's solve the problem like we did with quad cores?