Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Oct 2010 12:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445802
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
If anyone knows disingenuous, its Jobs. Apple inc, is based on the idea of a disingenuous field, alternatively referred to as a reality distortion field, but ultimately they are isomorphic to each other.
In fact, he's so disingenuous, that he can't help but frame his own comments disingenuously. His comments are not really directed towards the openness of Android, but the whether or not that model is better for consumers.
Its like calling a Jeep's off road capability disingenuous because of its poorer gas mileage when compared to a Prius.