To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well done
,
I would also like to point out that the guy pointed out the lack of application adapted to a 7" screen, where a vast majority of application available for the ipad are the same one that are for the iphone (the ipad can adapt the display different ways, one of them is zooming the interface).
I also love the sandpaper statement.
Then why on earth did Apple release a touch-based iPod Nano?!?!?!?!?!
- Perhaps because the nano has a very limited set of apps which are tailored (music related apps only) for the device whereas the iPad or any other tablet devices are designed to run plenty of very different apps (Internet apps, Office apps, multimedia apps...). Do you really think this difference in the use of the devices doesn't justify the size of the nano's screen and/or the use of multi-touch on the nano ?
I think that nothing, except for spec sheet padding, can justify inclusion of multi-touch on a DAP that has the size of the Nano. Touchscreens why not, for portability it makes sense (although my experience of touch on the D2 is that it's already a bit small for that, and nano is even smaller if I remember well), but multitouch on a nano is just as relevant at video playback on an iPod shuffle's power LED : physically, a human being equipped with average fingers can not take advantage of it.
Edited 2010-10-20 10:04 UTC




Member since:
2008-08-27
"...7" is too small for finger-friendly use..."
Then why on earth did Apple release a touch-based iPod Nano?!?!?!?!?!