Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Oct 2010 09:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 446536
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As a dedicated Kool-Aid drinker, I'm very saddened by this. Stupid decision.
Why? This is akin to back when Microsoft stopped supporting their own VM implementation. If Java is not Apple's focus, why not let a company (*cough* Oracle) take the burden? They are not "removing Java" they are simply saying "we are not going to make our own Java tools and VM". Oracle and the OpenJDK community could easily step up to the plate... If Apple were to open source their Java source tree, someone else could then take up the mantle.
This is all very "so, your technology failed to make inroads.. um... you can do all the donkey work now, we aren't interested in flogging your dead horse".
Because allot of developers use Java to develop applications. We use netbeans for our software.
Its not the end of the world but its bloody annoying.
Yes, somone *cough" Oracle _could_ take over, but frankly I think that's wishful thinking. Not sure how much incentive they have to do so.




Member since:
2006-02-22
As a dedicated Kool-Aid drinker, I'm very saddened by this. Stupid decision.