Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Oct 2010 22:33 UTC, submitted by sawboss
Thread beginning with comment 447366
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The whole, Russia wants to build a Windows rival was already in the news something like a year ago.
This happend right around the same time, Microsoft/BSA/whatever started bullying them (or specifically Russias educational institutes) about piracy.
Paying Microsoft licences would be a lot more expensive.
But I wouldn't call Russia well-off, a very large share of the inhabitants are poor. To many to call it a well-off country for my taste anyway.
Edited 2010-10-28 04:59 UTC




Member since:
2006-01-11
For a country as well-off as Russia, this is a piddlingly small amount of money (a few cents per citizen). And I don't think it has anything to do with Microsoft granting a license to nonprofits to stop the authorities from using "piracy" as an excuse to raid them, there are many other excuses.
I'm sure that the main interest is in having a fully auditable OS, rather than one with possible back doors that are easy to hide in a closed-source system.