Linked by Kroc Camen on Fri 10th Dec 2010 14:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 453169
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Covering politics - submit articles
by WorknMan on Sat 11th Dec 2010 00:24
in reply to "RE[3]: Covering politics - submit articles"
And you somehow magically lose said intelligence to draw your own conclusions once there's an opinion in the article you don't agree with?
Notice I said from a neutral point of view. Meaning, an article that's well balanced will have viewpoints from both sides of the political isle.
Thus, if you post an article that simply states your viewpoint about a particular subject and you only add points to back up what you believe, how is a reader supposed to draw any intelligent conclusions about a subject if you're also not giving them counterpoints?
For example, when it comes to Wikileaks, was there anything in that information that might endanger people's lives, including those serving in the military? Has it caused anyone to be killed or seriously harmed, or does it have the potential to? If the answer is yes, maybe you think it's irrelevant, but like I said... just lay the facts out on the table and let readers decide for themselves.
RE[5]: Covering politics - submit articles
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 11th Dec 2010 00:39
in reply to "RE[4]: Covering politics - submit articles"
Looks like to me you didn't need that at all - as you demonstrate with your comment, you're perfectly able to come up with that info without my help.
OSNews is not an island - don't treat it as such. We're part of the web, and you've most certainly read countless pieces on WikiLeaks that differ from mine.




Member since:
2005-06-29
And you somehow magically lose said intelligence to draw your own conclusions once there's an opinion in the article you don't agree with?
Curious.