Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 11th Dec 2010 18:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 453272
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: CUDA platform support on x86
by fithisux on Mon 13th Dec 2010 15:52
in reply to "RE: CUDA platform support on x86"
Hum interesting. That's why Nvidia's drivers do not support OpenCL on the CPU. They still want to lock people in with CUDA.
What is worse in my opinion is that OpenGL and OpenCL describe the drivers and not the hardware. If they could become real HW standards or provide standard graphics / acceleration hardware interfaces that are vendor /os -independent (it means no vendor and os specific drivers) then we could see a real revolution. You could have acceleration out of the box without driver installation. OS could provide everything irregardless of the chipset. At least for me OpenCL is a tremendous opportunity to utilize a 6-core phenom that is fully documented. Hardware must be designed according to standards and not standards according to drivers.
RE[3]: CUDA platform support on x86
by Neolander on Mon 13th Dec 2010 18:39
in reply to "RE[2]: CUDA platform support on x86"
Couldn't agree more... Though being a hobby OS developer might result in some bias in that area
Seriously, why should HW vendors be trusted to provide entire parts of the operating system in the form of (bloated) drivers, when they could just follow a standard spec in terms of hardware/software interface, and (re)write the spec when it's not good enough for them ?
Edited 2010-12-13 18:40 UTC




Member since:
2006-01-04
Hum interesting. That's why Nvidia's drivers do not support OpenCL on the CPU. They still want to lock people in with CUDA.