Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Dec 2010 23:34 UTC, submitted by Oliver
Thread beginning with comment 453826
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-15
I think the first step should be to validate Gregory Perry's claims that he was actually involved in something. For instance can he produce an actual copy of the 'NDA'? Can he show pay stubs? Can he name names in the FBI? Etc.
Alternatively, someone should file a Freedom of Information Act motion with the US government and see if there is substance to this claim.
This would help rule out a lot of conspiracy possibilities.