Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Jan 2011 22:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 456214
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
So perhaps we're moving to 64-bit for simplicity, not necessity.
Well, I wouldn't bother going 64-bit if it wasn't
1/A priori faster and certainly easier to use than 32-bit + PAE (no need to have the OS juggle with your data so that it fits in your 32-bit address space)
2/Much, much more convenient on x86 (AMD have taken the opportunity of AMD64 to clean up part of x86's legacy mess, so x86 processors are easier to play with in 64-bit mode ^^)
Edited 2011-01-06 17:42 UTC