Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Feb 2011 00:09 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes Oh. My. God. When I read this, and browsed the website, my face went like this. Do you remember the Amiga? That fun little computer that was miles ahead of its competition, but in recent years has been dragged through the mud by one shady figure after the next? Here's a new one: Amiga, Inc., the one 'run' by Bill McEwen, has partnered with a company called IContain to slap the Amiga logo on a bunch of low-end, incredibly sad products. Whether this is another shady deal I don't know, but worthy of the Amiga? I don't think so. I'm not putting this in the Amiga category, by the way. I refuse to. Forget it. It's going into our generic category. Fitting. Update: As was pointed out over at AmigaWorld.net, not only are these nothing more than brandless OEM products with Photoshopped logos, the website itself is just a standard, unmodified WordPress theme. Oi. Doesn't instil a lot of confidence, now, does it?
Thread beginning with comment 463892
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
:)
by ParadoxUncreated on Fri 25th Feb 2011 01:23 UTC
ParadoxUncreated
Member since:
2009-12-05

What was good about Amiga, c64 and probably many arcade machines, was that they were programmed in assembly and pushed to the limits. There was little or no os overhead, as the hardware was accessed directly. This again turned out smooth images, without "hiccups", so commonly known in todays operating systems. However as os-jitter, the cause of these stalls, are lowered in modern operating systems, the feel and smoothness of these old systems are recovered, with full modern capability. I don't think one should look to Amiga for that. Rather pushing the performance of os's in that direction, seems to happen quite a bit on Linux. I've also heard people speak positively of the possible perfomance of more obscure projects, like TRON.

Reply Score: 1

RE: :)
by aliquis on Fri 25th Feb 2011 03:33 in reply to ":)"
aliquis Member since:
2005-07-23

Look at RIMMs Playbook videos.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: :)
by Bully on Fri 25th Feb 2011 08:47 in reply to ":)"
Bully Member since:
2006-04-07

Amiga OS was written in C. not assembly.
Sure you could program in assembly, but that was not the common practice.

There was not 'one' thing that was good about it. It was a well thought out machine with both custom hardware that was ahead of it's time and it's own OS that was ahead of it's time also.

Edited 2011-02-25 08:49 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: :)
by Tuxie on Fri 25th Feb 2011 09:18 in reply to "RE: :)"
Tuxie Member since:
2009-04-22

Actually, most of the original AmigaOS (the Kickstart and AmigaDOS) was written in BCPL, a programming language from the mid 60s (7 years older than C) that nobody except AmigaOS developers used anymore. It was not until 4.0 that they had completely rewritten everything in C.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: :)
by MORB on Fri 25th Feb 2011 09:28 in reply to "RE: :)"
MORB Member since:
2005-07-06

exec.library (the (micro)kernel) at least was written in assembly. The source code for version 3.1 had been leaked a few years back.

Reply Parent Score: 3