Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Mar 2011 20:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 464702
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Lot of tablet hate out there
by JAlexoid on Fri 4th Mar 2011 00:18
in reply to "RE[3]: Lot of tablet hate out there"
Those kind of smart platforms are valuable because of apps. Windows dominates because of apps.
HP has to either entice(Apple, Adnroid) or pay off developers(Microsoft WP7 apps) to get things started.
Apple got the benefit of being the first "blowout" smartphone OS that had a proper app repo and reasonably cheap development tools(I'm looking at you Symbian....)
Android has a s***load of Java developers at a standby.
HP will have to pay some high profile developers...
RE[5]: Lot of tablet hate out there
by WorknMan on Fri 4th Mar 2011 00:39
in reply to "RE[4]: Lot of tablet hate out there"
Those kind of smart platforms are valuable because of apps. Windows dominates because of apps.
As I've always said... it's not about the platform, but about what you can run on it. (And I'm talking about apps that are out there RIGHT NOW, not what the potential of a thing is.) Most geeks still don't understand this.
Edited 2011-03-04 00:40 UTC





Member since:
2008-10-30
Do you know a little company called HP? Yeah, Palm could not have the guts to push their system forward, but I seriously doubt HP is here just to play