Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Mar 2011 15:50 UTC, submitted by Geoff Floding
Thread beginning with comment 465086
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: The commercial variant is required
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Mon 7th Mar 2011 20:59
in reply to "RE[5]: The commercial variant is required"
There were two questions posed. I'm unsure which one you were answering. Care to clarify?
No, a distributor of LGPL binaries is not required to distribute source as well?
Or
No, that isn't the reason why these select industries do not want to use LGPL licensed software?
Edited 2011-03-07 20:59 UTC




Member since:
2005-09-08
No.