Linked by David Adams on Mon 7th Mar 2011 17:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 465293
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: maybe its the license
by lucas_maximus on Tue 8th Mar 2011 21:36
in reply to "RE[6]: maybe its the license"
RE[8]: maybe its the license
by Oliver on Tue 8th Mar 2011 22:49
in reply to "RE[7]: maybe its the license"





Member since:
2007-11-09
That is one difference between BSD and Linux. Most BSDs encourage building from ports. There are two choices for going to packages though:
PC-BSD (PBIs)
MidnightBSD (mport packages)
I forked FreeBSD because it lacked on the desktop and I also need developers. My goal is to make a desktop OS and not to make a server/embedded platform. The first task was coming up with a unique ports and package system. I just committed the first working version (with remote fetch, search, etc) of the new mport package management tools this week. I'm planning on writing a GUI version as well.
PC-BSD is much ahead of us on installation and package management at the moment, but that's going to change.
I suggest desktop users get involved with MidnightBSD or PC-BSD development if they want to improve the BSD on the desktop situation. We're the two projects trying to do that. Feature requests welcome.