Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Mar 2011 12:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 465748
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Why no GNOME Perspective?
by HappyGod on Fri 11th Mar 2011 14:26
in reply to "RE[7]: Why no GNOME Perspective?"
RE[9]: Why no GNOME Perspective?
by WereCatf on Fri 11th Mar 2011 14:30
in reply to "RE[8]: Why no GNOME Perspective?"
RE[8]: Why no GNOME Perspective?
by Mystilleef on Fri 11th Mar 2011 14:57
in reply to "RE[7]: Why no GNOME Perspective?"
I don't mind your opinions. However, I don't come here to read your opinions. I'd subscribe to your blog or tweets if I was interested in your opinions. I come here for news. Is it too much to expect news to be balanced and objective?
Skewing the news to fit your opinions is unprofessional and tarnishes your credibility as a news outlet. Provide the evidence and facts and let your audience judge for themselves.
I'm not saying you shouldn't give an editorial opinion, but make it known via a disclaimer that you're making one.
I don't get a commission for who you side with. So I don't really care whose side you're on.
RE[9]: Why no GNOME Perspective?
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 11th Mar 2011 15:24
in reply to "RE[8]: Why no GNOME Perspective?"
I don't mind your opinions. However, I don't come here to read your opinions. I'd subscribe to your blog or tweets if I was interested in your opinions. I come here for news. Is it too much to expect news to be balanced and objective?
OSNews has been this way for years, and only now, when the opinion is not to your liking, do you complain? That's typical.
There is no such thing as balanced news, and never did we state we aspire to it. You are just saying that because you want to discredit me, because you can't stand the fact that I'm not on your side. That's fine, but then be a man about it and just say so. This hoity-toity behaviour is silly and isn't fooling anyone.
Edited 2011-03-11 15:29 UTC





Member since:
2005-06-29
Yeah yeah and if the article had chosen KDE's side you wouldn't have said a thing.
You just don't like it that I'm not siding with GNOME in my article - which is my prerogative. It's fine if you dislike that, but don't try to wrap it in a hoity-toity shroud of "journalistic standards blah blah". We're a blog, and we've never pretended otherwise. Don't try to make us into something we don't pretend to be just to claim some moral high ground.