Linked by Oliver on Fri 11th Mar 2011 23:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 465943
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Better to wait for innovation to settle
by Oliver on Sun 13th Mar 2011 07:40
in reply to "RE[3]: Better to wait for innovation to settle"
RE[5]: Better to wait for innovation to settle
by danieldk on Sun 13th Mar 2011 19:58
in reply to "RE[4]: Better to wait for innovation to settle"
FYI: I was daniel@NetBSD.org. NetBSD 'supported' platforms for which distributions were built, but where nobody checked wether they would actually boot. Simply because there was no one on the relevant port lists with working hardware. In that manner the list is somewhat deceptive. And even if a machine does boot, it is pretty worthless without drivers. And Linux has an edge on drivers on nearly every widely used platform (ARM, i386, x86_64, and PPC).
Edited 2011-03-13 19:59 UTC




Member since:
2005-11-18
And he is entirely entitled to that opinion. Given that Linux runs on many very many platforms these days (at least as many as NetBSD), includes a lot of security technology (no SEBSD in OpenBSD), and has also shown to be performant (the days where FreeBSD was the king of the hill have long passed by), it isn't hard to come to the conclusion that BSD (outside OS X) is obsolete.
As much as I dislike the GPL, even most device vendors do not seem to have problems with using Linux/busybox/..., despite their use of the GPL. They have proven that the license advantage of BSD isn't as big as we once assumed.