Linked by David Adams on Wed 30th Mar 2011 15:38 UTC, submitted by John
Thread beginning with comment 468399
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda
by jtfolden on Wed 30th Mar 2011 19:05
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda"
"Btw, you seem to have ignored my very first enquiry to you? I guess there's no hard evidence.
I need proof for an opinion? You can never prove this. It's just something that fits well within an established pattern. "
You don't need proof but it isn't a credible opinion, nor does it fit, if there's nothing to back it up. The delay (and it isn't really a delay as nothing had even been announced) could be for any number of reasons. It could be a change purely due to strategic marketing decisions this year (pushing new iPads in the spring and iPhones in the fall, for example). Maybe the new iOS simply isn't ready and they don't want to rush out an iPhone 5 running 4.x software.
Without evidence, one theory is no more likely over any other.
RE[7]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 30th Mar 2011 19:10
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Thom_Holwerda"
The new iOS isn't ready?
So you mean they don't have the manpower to finish it on their regular schedule? What would cause such a lack of manpower, hmm? You realise that actually fits within my theory, right?
Of course, it could be any number of reasons. However, if you look at the past, it's not at all odd to assume that it could be because Apple is trying to do too much.





Member since:
2005-06-29
I need proof for an opinion? You can never prove this. It's just something that fits well within an established pattern.