Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st Mar 2011 08:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 468484
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Innovation in what?
by ricegf on Thu 31st Mar 2011 09:46
in reply to "RE: Innovation in what?"
RE[2]: Innovation in what?
by bitwelder on Thu 31st Mar 2011 10:50
in reply to "RE: Innovation in what?"
The market is unfair, yes, so there is something to complain about it, but:
""We readily appreciate that Google should continue to have the freedom to innovate," Smith concludes, "But it shouldn't be permitted to pursue practices that restrict others from innovating and offering competitive alternatives"
""We readily appreciate that Google should continue to have the freedom to innovate," Smith concludes, "But it shouldn't be permitted to pursue practices that restrict others from innovating and offering competitive alternatives"
So, Google 'innovates' e.g. by adding some new feature in accessing Youtube from their Android phones.
Where is the 'innovation' that Microsoft want to brings in with simply dipping into Google data? "
what antitrust is about..
if for example google controls 99% of the video distribution (note the if), then they are a monopoly on that.
If google applies special rules that forbid others to compete (can't start competing service / can't access google service the same way as they do etc) then antitrust applies.
When the service is NOT a monopoly, antitrust does not apply.
IANAL but this is a quick & dirty explanation





Member since:
2010-04-27
The market is unfair, yes, so there is something to complain about it, but:
So, Google 'innovates' e.g. by adding some new feature in accessing Youtube from their Android phones.
Where is the 'innovation' that Microsoft want to brings in with simply dipping into Google data?