To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Agreed.
What I would love to hear, though, is the opinion of someone who actually publishes apps on the Market - is "Verizon doesn't want it" allowed by Googles 'open' terms of service?
EDIT: hmmm, quoting Android Market Developer Program Policies
Network Usage and Terms
Applications must not create unpredictable network usage that has an adverse impact on a user's service charges or an Authorized Carrier's network. Applications also may not knowingly violate an Authorized Carrier's terms of service for allowed usage or any Google terms of service.
Given the way the Android Market is fragmented into multiple, carrier-specific stores, this pretty much gives Google the right to remove apps such as PDANet from a specific Market - Verizons and AT&Ts for example.
Edited 2011-05-03 23:37 UTC
Carriers: Help us block these tethering apps like Apple is doing for us or else we'll decrease the Android advertising budget.
Google: Okay.
Oh really? Considering my original iPhone had tethering blocked - by the carrier - then later added as a fee service - by the carrier after complaints to Apple - then later made free - by the carrier after more complaints to Apple - and my current iPhone has four times the original's monthly data limit and has HotSpot enabled, I'd suggest you might just be (yet again) wrong...




Member since:
2006-04-03
AT&T: Help us block these tethering apps so we can sell more data and we'll give you a percentage of the take.
Google: Ok