Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th May 2011 21:07 UTC, submitted by sawboss
Thread beginning with comment 471995
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-09-23
Just to be clear. We're not talking about a 25 employee car repair shop which run one server to host their website, email and employee database (no offense meant against those people), but a multi-billion dollar company like Sony. They definitely have the manpower and financial means to build and maintain a secure and always up-to-date infrastructure.
And if Sony doesn't feel they can handle the server administration themselves, they can easily contract an external company to do that. For an online service like PSN where people's credit card information is hosted on the servers, a properly secured environment is not optional but mandatory.
Sorry, but there is NO excuse for that.
Adrian