Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th May 2011 08:19 UTC, submitted by porcel
Thread beginning with comment 472529
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No, XMPP is decentralized: different parties can use different servers and communicate without any problem (http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/technology-overview/).
I agree with your other arguments.
End user needs simple, seamless and effortless solution.
Example: Google Talk tries to provide that using interoperable (XMPP/Jingle) technologies. Mobile video calls using Jingle (http://goo.gl/326Dd) are a good step, but there is still a lot to be done there.
I hope Microsoft/Skype takeover will motivate other open solutions to go in that direction too (XMPP/Jingle).
Edited 2011-05-10 12:32 UTC




Member since:
2006-02-15
But then you need to figure out what XMPP server you wish to connect to and so on, and THEN get all your friends and family on the same server. That's too much hassle for the general populace to bother with, it needs to have a central server that's used by all.
I am not familiar with them tho, and a price of such service may be a different story.
Again, that is not convenient. Users would have to learn what the hell SIP is anyways and then find someone to provide paid SIP services and so on, and THEN continue to configure the client to use the relevant settings. Not going to happen.
(I have no affiliation with Jitsi or any other 3rd party whatsoever, just wanted to help.)
Yeah, there's plenty of alternatives if you're just going to use client-to-client video chat, but as a Skype-alternative Jitsi doesn't come even close.