Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th May 2011 21:50 UTC, submitted by fran
Windows The ARM version of Windows 8 might have just become the most desired version of Windows in our hearts and minds. After us talking about legacy code and backwards compatibility in Windows for years now, an Intel senior vice president, Renee James, has just stated that Windows 8 on ARM will not have any form of compatibility for legacy applications whatsoever. Update: Microsoft has responded to Intel's claims. "Intel's statements during yesterday's Intel Investor Meeting about Microsoft's plans for the next version of Windows were factually inaccurate and unfortunately misleading," the company said, "From the first demonstrations of Windows on SoC, we have been clear about our goals and have emphasized that we are at the technology demonstration stage. As such, we have no further details or information at this time."
Thread beginning with comment 473678
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by orestes
by j.dalrymple on Thu 19th May 2011 04:20 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by orestes"
j.dalrymple
Member since:
2011-03-29

"All the apps" aren't going away. Their developers will just re-build them for the ARM version of Windows.

The only programs this will affect are the ones that aren't being actively maintained.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Comment by orestes
by toast88 on Thu 19th May 2011 07:19 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by orestes"
toast88 Member since:
2009-09-23

"All the apps" aren't going away. Their developers will just re-build them for the ARM version of Windows.

The only programs this will affect are the ones that aren't being actively maintained.


That's actually not that easy. A lot of applications and software use optimized assembly code which cannot simply recompiled.

Examples are hardware drivers, JITs in Google Chrome, Firefox, Flash Player, Java, multimedia codecs etc.

People still code assembler nowadays and for a reason, mind you!

Adrian

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Comment by orestes
by toomuchtatose on Thu 19th May 2011 08:55 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by orestes"
toomuchtatose Member since:
2011-05-15

As long as the underlying HAL is code-optimised (crucial job for OS developers), developers shouldn't be so engrossed with the performance of the architecture. I think that is his/her perspective.

But of course, the race to productivity is another issue, essentially it is my opinion that not any amount of assembly-optimisation can replace bigger monitors, better desk and chair, a good keyboard and mouse, for work requiring interactivity.

Else, non-interactive work should be relegate to something like itaniums, x86, ppc or sparc....

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Comment by orestes
by viton on Thu 19th May 2011 12:17 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by orestes"
viton Member since:
2005-08-09

Examples are hardware drivers, JITs in Google Chrome, Firefox, Flash Player, Java, multimedia codecs etc.

So, name the app from your list that isn't working on ARM.

Edited 2011-05-19 12:19 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Comment by orestes
by j.dalrymple on Fri 20th May 2011 03:03 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by orestes"
j.dalrymple Member since:
2011-03-29

That's actually not that easy. A lot of applications and software use optimized assembly code which cannot simply recompiled.


Actually, that's a good point.

Reply Parent Score: 1