Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Fri 27th May 2011 11:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 474872
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: IO calls never need to block.
by JAlexoid on Sun 29th May 2011 10:43
in reply to "RE[4]: IO calls never need to block."
RE[6]: IO calls never need to block.
by Alfman on Sun 29th May 2011 18:24
in reply to "RE[5]: IO calls never need to block."




Member since:
2011-01-28
JAlexoid,
"Well you then know not much about how Java and C# synchronisation mechanisms work. If you're into Java I suggest watching some of Cliff Click's tech talks on concurrency and memory model."
Well that's just not fair, your trying to make fun of me and I'm trying to have a serious discussion... I won't go to your level.
"Reentrant mutex or lock works by allowing the same thread to acquire it more than one time. Also requires it to be released the number of times it was acquired. It essentially has the owning thread + counter."
You're echoing what I had said... in any case, it wasn't applicable to the problem being discussed.