Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Jun 2011 19:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479005
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Google doesn't like walled gardens...
by pantheraleo on Wed 29th Jun 2011 01:13
in reply to "Google doesn't like walled gardens..."
RE[2]: Google doesn't like walled gardens...
by modmans2ndcoming on Wed 29th Jun 2011 01:48
in reply to "RE: Google doesn't like walled gardens..."
RE[2]: Google doesn't like walled gardens...
by molnarcs on Wed 29th Jun 2011 14:57
in reply to "RE: Google doesn't like walled gardens..."
What the f are you talking about. Google+ is the antithesis of Facebook in this regard. Just posted on ./
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/06/29/1315243/Google-Takeout-Lets...
RE: Google doesn't like walled gardens...
by modmans2ndcoming on Wed 29th Jun 2011 01:49
in reply to "Google doesn't like walled gardens..."
RE[2]: Google doesn't like walled gardens...
by pantheraleo on Wed 29th Jun 2011 06:50
in reply to "RE: Google doesn't like walled gardens..."
walled gardens are bad for users. Users just don't know it yet....just like people don't know a lot of things are actually bad for them.
Ok. You go ahead and continue to think that way. Go ahead and continue to naively believe that privacy isn't important, and it doesn't matter who gets access to your information, your random thoughts, etc. But don't come crying to me when it gets you in trouble some day.
RE[2]: Google doesn't like walled gardens...
by tomcat on Thu 30th Jun 2011 19:23
in reply to "RE: Google doesn't like walled gardens..."





Member since:
2006-01-06
Not because walled gardens are bad for users. Facebook is ample proof that people don't mind living in a walled garden.
But ... walled gardens are bad for Google. It can't index the content. It can't pimp the users/content to advertisers. Which is fine by me. Google is way too big in search, already.