Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Aug 2011 21:27 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 483225
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
its no longer Mozilla, its Chrozilla. but yeah Mozilla has been dead for awhile. FF5 really has nothing new unlike FF6
anyone seen a Picture of a mockup of a linux UX build?
anyone seen a Picture of a mockup of a linux UX build?
If Chrome didn't exist would Mozilla be copying IE9 or Opera? If my sarcasm isn't clear; a good idea can originate anywhere and using it is only smart.
RE[3]: Comment by Luminair
by Sabz on Wed 3rd Aug 2011 08:41
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Luminair"
"its no longer Mozilla, its Chrozilla. but yeah Mozilla has been dead for awhile. FF5 really has nothing new unlike FF6
anyone seen a Picture of a mockup of a linux UX build?
anyone seen a Picture of a mockup of a linux UX build?
If Chrome didn't exist would Mozilla be copying IE9 or Opera? If my sarcasm isn't clear; a good idea can originate anywhere and using it is only smart. "
Mozilla arent copying anyone. look at the UX branch Tabs, much different from Chrome and opera or IE . the only think i can think of that Mozilla are doing some similar to Chrome and thats there JavaScript. Mozilla have been slow to act on DOM compared to what Chrome does, Chrome uses Multi Processes on all where FF only uses 2 out of 3 Multi Processes , in the UX branch i think should have all 3 using all 3 Multi processes, ( i'd have to dig up the article about that ) and im to lazy, plus its near dinner time where i live anyway http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2094853/mozilla-looks-mult...
Edited 2011-08-03 08:45 UTC
Member since:
2005-07-07
its no longer Mozilla, its Chrozilla. but yeah Mozilla has been dead for awhile. FF5 really has nothing new unlike FF6
anyone seen a Picture of a mockup of a linux UX build?