Linked by David Adams on Wed 17th Aug 2011 17:53 UTC, submitted by HAL2001
Thread beginning with comment 485658
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
At this point, it's not so much about the encryption itself being secure; we've had more or less "impossible to crack" encryption for many years now. It's all about how secure you keep the key. After all, the most secure door lock in the world is utterly useless if you leave your keychain on the front porch. The same applies to any method of securing data, be it cryptography, obfuscation or physical security.