Linked by David Adams on Sat 20th Aug 2011 15:38 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Editorial In five years, Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst sees the traditional desktop becoming obsolete.
Thread beginning with comment 486294
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Read the damn article...
by phoenix on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 18:36 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Read the damn article..."
Member since:

He's actually talking about growing maintenance cost on fat desktop. Fat application have a higher maintenance cost because you've got the whole release/update process that's made much easier with web apps.

What's sad is that RedHat has all the tools required to support diskless computing (full-fledged PC on the desk but without any local storage, booting off the network, mounting NFS shares from a central server, but running apps locally). And they want to go off on some "cloud" or "vdi" adventure instead.

I guess they feel they can make more money selling skookum servers with lots of RHEL licenses, rather than a small server with a single RHEL license support Fedora diskless stations.

But you'll still need fat client for most resources-heavy apps : programming, cao, photoshop, etc...

No, you need a diskless station. No need for local disk, local OS, local apps, etc.

Reply Parent Score: 2