Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 4th Sep 2011 15:48 UTC
Legal "Secret U.S. government cables show a stunning willingness by senior Canadian officials to appease American demands (more here) for a U.S.-style copyright law here. The documents describe Canadian officials as encouraging American lobbying efforts. They also cite cabinet minister Maxime Bernier raising the possibility of showing U.S. officials a draft bill before tabling it in Parliament. The cables, from the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa, even have a policy director for then industry minister Tony Clement suggesting it might help U.S. demands for a tough copyright law if Canada were placed among the worst offenders on an international piracy watch list. Days later, the U.S. placed Canada alongside China and Russia on the list." Unbelievable. Suddenly I understand why the SFPD had no qualms about acting as henchmen for Apple goons to violate someone's constitutional rights. If a government is messed up, it only makes sense this is reflected in the corporate policies of its prime corporations.
Thread beginning with comment 488437
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I am not a fan of the DMCA
by ssokolow on Sun 4th Sep 2011 17:41 UTC in reply to "I am not a fan of the DMCA"
ssokolow
Member since:
2010-01-21

Saying that I also don't care for people who steal. I don't care if it is a candy, a pen, or a grape off the store counter or an apple in a field. It is all stealing to me. How can any so call civilized person think that stealing movies and music is any way to live. I guess some people just get wrapped up in theft and they can't help themselves.

Learn to say this more often. "Bad angel get off of my shoulder." Cause that is what seems to be driving the want for stolen movies and music and software.


I don't want to start another big debate, but in case anyone new wanders in, the general argument made by people who aren't just in a frenzy of downloading is as follows:

- Theft deprives the original owner of a thing they already had
- Copyright infringement leaves their ownership intact and gives them an excuse to whine that every download must have been a lost sale (rather than potential word-of-mouth advertising as some people see it)
- Piracy is theft and murder on the high seas.

Again, I'm NOT looking to start a debate. I've got better things to do.

Reply Parent Score: 5

Lennie Member since:
2007-09-22

Here are some numbers from people who have done the research.

Do you remember the poeple from HADOPI ? Does are the people that worked on getting the 'three strikes out, you do not get any internet access anymore'-policy implemented in France. That is where these numbers come from.

Here is a Dutch article that describes/analyzes the numbers from the research of HADOPI where I got my information from:

https://www.bof.nl/2011/08/08/het-ultieme-bewijs-downloaders-zijn-be...

Here are is the result:

People that download more/the most from an 'illegal source' are the same people that spend more/the most money on movies and music.

What does this probably mean ? People who have a real interrest in music/movies download have no problem paying for their music/movies, but if the music/movie industry does not provide them with the service they need, they will get it somewhere else.

This could for example mean people want to copy cassettes, cd's and mp3 from other people to sample things.

When they like it, they will buy the real CD (possibly because they downloaded quality might not have been as good) and go to a concert.

Or they want to watch a TV-series that is only available on TV in the US and they are in a country where Netflix or similair is not offered. They will use P2P to download it instead.

And so on and so on...

Reply Parent Score: 3