Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:22 UTC, submitted by kragil
Thread beginning with comment 490529
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Informing the public isn't good enough
by JoeBuck on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 23:35
in reply to "Information"
Major vendors should be told that if their inexpensive machines don't provide a way to disable secure boot, or provide some other means to boot non-Microsoft operating systems, they'll be hit with antitrust suits for conspiring with a convicted monopolist to suppress competition.
Otherwise they'll provide only a special line of "developer machines" or "technical workstations" that cost hundreds more, so instead of a Windows tax you'll have to pay a hefty premium if you want to run Linux, BSD, or some other OS on your machine.




Member since:
2006-01-04
Every news outlet just needs to tell PC buyers that the option to turn it off is important. Give negative points in reviews and make comparison sites highlight the option.
I think we need to be worried.
If mainboards/PC without the option to turn it off don't sell well the market will make sure that the option will be available.
That is what would would happen in a perfect world...