Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Oct 2011 21:33 UTC, submitted by mahmudinashar
Thread beginning with comment 492973
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Regarding the lack of GNOME 2.x
by chemical_scum on Fri 14th Oct 2011 02:59
in reply to "RE[3]: Regarding the lack of GNOME 2.x"
People forget how long it took Gnome 2.x to come up to speed.
When Gnome 2 came out I disliked it so much (slow on old hardware, especially Nautilus then the worlds slowest file manager)that I switched to Xfce 3 for a couple of years until I returned to GNOME.
I am off to Xfce once I have to upgrade after Lucid LTS is no longer supported next year.
The Cairo GLX dock is very good. It works well in standalone Compiz it also integrates nicely with Xfce just as it does with Gnome 2.
I might go for Xubuntu or maybe Debian. Maybe I will give Mint a spin.




Member since:
2005-07-06
I'm one of the people liking Gnome-Shell, or rather where it shows potential to be once it matures. People forget how long it took Gnome 2.x to come up to speed.
I can see where people wouldn't be fond of the new metaphor though. luckily for all of us there's a wide range of choice when it comes to desktops.